UK would regret no-deal Brexit ‘for ever’ – Greg Clark - 02/02/2019
UK weather: Met Office warns of -16C snow bomb this Saturday as Brits must to prepare for more snow - 02/02/2019
Brexit ‘plot’ by lawmakers ‘extremely concerning,’ Downing Street says - 20/01/2019
BREXIT BETRAYAL: Remainers plot to stop Brexit ‘They will do ‘ANYTHING to stop’ EU exit’ - 20/01/2019
No Trousers Tube Ride – Hundreds of Londoners stripped off to celebrate - 14/01/2019
What time is the Brexit ‘meaningful vote’ in Parliament tomorrow, and what will happen if Theresa May’s deal is rejected? - 14/01/2019
Police Share Weird Footage Showing Glowing Light In The Sky - 30 mins ago
Japan’s Abe refuses to deny that he nominated Trump for Nobel Peace Prize - 30 mins ago
Trump’s allies get set for fierce fight over emergency declaration - 30 mins ago
Anaesthetists say patients at risk after flawed oxygen guidelines - 30 mins ago
Credibility of Catholic church at stake in sexual abuse summit - 30 mins ago
Monday briefing: Facebook branded ‘digital gangster’ - 2 hours ago
‘I believe Putin’: Trump dismissed US advice on North Korea threat, says McCabe - 2 hours ago
Chelsea v Man Utd: Vote for your favourite FA Cup goal - 2 hours ago
Theodore McCarrick is defrocked by Pope Francis because of abuse allegations - 2 hours ago
Why so glum, China? - 2 hours ago
DNA tests to establish if fertility doctor secretly fathered 200 children
A group of 22 people have won the right to have their DNA checked against that of a Dutch fertility clinic doctor who is feared to have fathered 200 children by using his own sperm rather than that of donors. Jan Karbaat, who died in April 2017 aged 89, always denied the accusations and refused…
A group of 22 people have won the right to have their DNA checked against that of a Dutch fertility clinic doctor who is feared to have fathered 200 children by using his own sperm rather than that of donors.
Jan Karbaat, who died in April 2017 aged 89, always denied the accusations and refused to cooperate with those potentially affected.
But a court has ruled that DNA tests can be undertaken as there is sufficient evidence to suggest Karbaat used his sperm without declaring it.
One of the children, Merel-Lotte Heij, said in response to the judgment that “every child has the right to know where he comes from”.
In 2017, 22 children who had been conceived with the help of Karbaat’s Blijdorp medical centre in Barendrecht, south of Rotterdam, and 11 of their parents, went to court to demand a DNA test.
The doctor died a month before the lawsuit and Karbaat’s family lawyer fiercely fought against any DNA checks, saying the privacy of the deceased and his relatives should be respected.
The judge felt at that stage there was insufficient evidence to allow the tests. The courtonly gave permissionfor Karbaat’s DNA, collected from 27 personal objects, including a toothbrush, to be secured in a safe.
Since the 2017 hearing, significant DNA links between a legal child of Karbaat and those conceived with his clinic’s help have emerged.
The court on Wednesday ruled that the interests of those who want to know if they are descended from the doctor outweighed the interests of Karbaat’s widow and heirs.
“If he did [use his own sperm], without announcing it at the time, his widow and other heirs cannot claim that the doctor’s anonymity should be respected,” the judge said.
It is feared that as many as 200 children may have been fathered by Karbaat. Clinical tests in 2017 suggested a high level of certainty about the paternity of 47 children.
Dutch children born to donors before 2004, when the law was changed, have no legal right to know the identity of their biological parent.
But the judge said the Karbaat case had special merit given the alleged illegality of the doctor’s actions. Dutch law limits the number of people who can be conceived from one sperm donor to 25.
The 2017 hearing had heard that Karbaat once reportedly boasted of fathering 60 children throughIVFtreatment.
When his clinic was shut down in 2009, major administrative irregularities were found. He is thought to have falsified data and the descriptions of donors.