Ask Ethan: Would An Alien Civilization Classify Earth As An ‘Interesting’ Planet?

All across the Universe, trillions of galaxies can be seen, with each one typically containing billions and billions of stars. Here on Earth, life not only arose, thrived, and became complex and differentiated, but intelligent, technologically advanced, and even spacefaring, to a degree. But these last advances — taking us into the space and information ages — are extremely recent, and space is enormous. If an alien civilization saw us, would we even appear interesting from their perspective? Tayte Taliaferro wants to know, asking:

I was thinking about the projection of light through space. My curtain was open and I saw the stars and something from a book popped into my head. It had said that the stars we see are basically reruns. The light is from so long ago, we don’t even know if the star still exists or not.

[…] Whatever signals we send out, or changes in our planet that might be observable to prove intelligent life lives here, would take billions of years to reach anything alive and capable of responding! What do you think?

I think these are great questions to ponder, and that science has an awful lot to say about what aliens would see by looking at Earth.

In our Solar System, Earth is a rocky planet with a thin atmosphere that orbits our Sun in what we call the habitable zone: at a distance where liquid water, given an Earth-like atmosphere, can stably exist on the planet’s surface. Mars and Venus may potentially lie in that region of space as well, but Venus is presently too hot and Mars is too cold (and with too thin of an atmosphere) for Earth-like life to thrive there.

At present, our two most prolific methods for finding planets outside of the Solar System are:

  1. the stellar wobble method, where an orbiting planet tugs on its parent star, causing it to oscillate along the viewer’s line-of-sight, and enabling scientists to determine the planet’s period and mass (up to the uncertainty of its orbital orientation), and
  2. the transit method, where an orbiting planet transits across the face of its parent star from the perspective of an external observer, periodically causing the parent star to dim as the planet’s disk blocks a portion of the star’s light.

If a sufficiently advanced alien civilization were examining Earth from a great distance, and we happened to be at the right orientation for our world to transit across the face of the Sun from their perspective, they’d have extraordinary reasons to be hopeful about finding out our world was inhabited.

It’s true: light can only travel at some finite speed (the speed of light), meaning that even the nearest stars are only now receiving signals from our planet that were emitted years or decades ago. More distant stars within our galaxy see Earth as it was centuries or millennia ago, while observers in distant galaxies see us as we were millions or even billions of years ago. Still, signatures that our planet is inhabited could be found from even a few billion light-years away, as aliens could take a spectrum of Earth’s atmosphere whenever a transit occurred.

As Earth passes in front of the Sun (or any planet passes in front of its parent star), the starlight that collides with:

  • the surface of Earth simply gets blocked, causing a flux dip announcing the planet’s presence,
  • nothing at all, missing the planet entirely, simply streams freely from the star to the observer, making up the background light,
  • the atmosphere of Earth (but not the surface) will largely pass through, but the atoms and molecules present will absorb a fraction of that light.

The absorbed light will excite the atoms or molecules they collide with, which can result in either an absorption or emission feature showing up in the atmospheric spectrum. We’ve already used this technique to discover atoms like hydrogen and helium — and even molecules like water — in the atmospheres of planets beyond our own Solar System.

If an alien civilization were capable of observing our planet at any point over the past 2-to-2.5 billion years, they’d discover a planet whose atmosphere was made mostly out of nitrogen gas, but with a very large-and-substantial fraction of molecular oxygen as well. Water vapor and argon gas would make up about 1% of the atmosphere each, and then there’d be trace amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, ozone, and a few other notable compounds.

This combination of gases would be a “smoking gun” for life if we found it on a world other than our own. We know of a few inorganic pathways to arrive at substantial amounts of oxygen on a planet, but reaching a level of 5% or more seems to be extremely disfavored without life. The presence of oxygen in a primarily nitrogen atmosphere is even more favorable for life, and so if Earth transited across the face of the Sun for an alien civilization, we’d be a tremendously interesting world, even during the era of the dinosaurs.

That’s a solid way to search for potentially inhabited worlds, but it only works for planets that are serendipitously aligned with their parent star from the viewpoint of an external, distant observer. It’s how future observatories, like the James Webb Space Telescope or the 30-meter ground-based telescopes currently under construction, plan to search the nearest transiting worlds to Earth for potential biosignatures.

However, we’re certain to miss most of the inhabited worlds if the transit technique is the only one we use. If the alignment is off by even a tiny amount — a fraction of a degree for a planet like Earth — the transit simply won’t occur, and we’ll have no way of probing its atmospheric contents. But all hope isn’t lost, because there’s another technique that doesn’t rely on a lucky alignment, and could be brought within our reach with foreseeable improvements in technology: direct imaging.

Owing to the power of the Hubble Space Telescope (and later, ground-based adaptive optics), we’ve already taken our first direct images of exoplanets, and have even witnessed them actively orbiting their parent stars. By utilizing instruments such as a coronagraph or a starshade, we can block the light of the parent star the potentially inhabited planet orbits, imaging only the planet of interest instead.

From just a single pixel, if we’re willing to wait and observe the distant world over large amounts of time, we could not only tell whether it’s inhabited or not, but additionally we could look for some of the most striking features we find on Earth. By taking a direct image of a planet and quantifying the various wavelengths of light that arrive at different times, there’s a very long list of properties we could learn.

From short-period changes and recurrent spectroscopic signatures, we could determine what the orbital period of the planet is.

From the colors of the planet, we could determine how much of the world is covered in water versus land versus ice, and detect the presence of clouds if they exist.

Over the course of a year (where the planet makes a full revolution around its parent star), we could determine:

  • its orbital properties (from the phases),
  • whether the land masses turn green and brown and green again with the passing of seasons (from photometric observations),
  • and, with advanced enough technology, we could even determine if there’s artificial lighting of any type unexpectedly illuminating the planet’s night side.

For an observer located less than 100 light-years away, that artificial lighting would be visible to a telescope large enough and optimized to view this type of faint light. It’s an amazing feat of technology that human beings have conquered the darkness of night through artificial lighting, but there’s a cost: the loss of the natural darkness that plants, animals, and other living creatures have adapted to over billions of years of evolution.

However, there’s a benefit we don’t often consider: the fact that we’ve modified the natural appearance of our planet means that a sufficiently intelligent alien species observing us could infer the existence of a planet-altering species. It’s not a slam dunk, but such a signature is a strong hint that the planet isn’t only inhabited, but inhabited by an intelligent, technologically advanced species.

Without a second example of life in the Universe, we can only speculate on what the odds of life arising on a potentially habitable planet are. There could be billions of other worlds in the galaxy with life on them right now, or Earth could be the only one. There could be complex life that sustains itself for hundreds of millions or even billions of years on a plethora of planets in the Milky Way, or Earth could be it.

And finally, there could be thousands of spacefaring alien species in our galaxy, or human beings might be the most advanced creatures in the entire visible Universe. Until we find a second example of life to know that we aren’t alone, all we can do is speculate and impose limits on what isn’t out there.

The same signals that we’re seeking from other civilizations — atmospheric signatures, surface features that evolve in a particular way, satellites and spacecraft, even deliberate and information-rich signals like FM radio waves — make our own civilization detectable by equally (or more) advanced extraterrestrials. From even a great distance away, an inhabited Earth would be identifiable, but an Earth inhabited by technologically advanced beings is only detectable to those civilizations close enough to see us in our recently achieved state.

Even though the majority of galaxies in the Universe are many billions of light-years away, there are millions upon millions of stars located within just a few hundred light-years of Earth. That means millions of planets, millions of chances at life, and even millions of possibilities for intelligent aliens. If even one such nearby world turns out to be inhabited, even the great cosmic distances won’t keep us from finding out about them, just as they’ll be more than capable of finding out about us, too.

The speed of light may be a limiting factor, but with enough time, the impact of human beings will be visible to any being residing in any one of more than 60 billion galaxies. It might not make for the fastest conversation, but finding even one instance of alien life beyond Earth would change our conception of existence forever. I can’t wait for us to find out!


Send in your Ask Ethan questions to startswithabang at gmail dot com!

“>

The ideal ‘Earth 2.0’ will be an Earth-sized, Earth-mass planet at a similar Earth-Sun distance from… [+] a star that’s very much like our own. We have yet to find such a world, but are working hard to estimate how many such planets might be out there in our galaxy. With so much data at our disposal, it’s puzzling how varied the different estimates are.

NASA Ames/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle

All across the Universe, trillions of galaxies can be seen, with each one typically containing billions and billions of stars. Here on Earth, life not only arose, thrived, and became complex and differentiated, but intelligent, technologically advanced, and even spacefaring, to a degree. But these last advances — taking us into the space and information ages — are extremely recent, and space is enormous. If an alien civilization saw us, would we even appear interesting from their perspective? Tayte Taliaferro wants to know, asking:

I was thinking about the projection of light through space. My curtain was open and I saw the stars and something from a book popped into my head. It had said that the stars we see are basically reruns. The light is from so long ago, we don’t even know if the star still exists or not.

[…] Whatever signals we send out, or changes in our planet that might be observable to prove intelligent life lives here, would take billions of years to reach anything alive and capable of responding! What do you think?

I think these are great questions to ponder, and that science has an awful lot to say about what aliens would see by looking at Earth.

The orbits of the eight major planets vary in eccentricity and the difference between perihelion… [+] (closest approach) and aphelion (farthest distance) with respect to the Sun. There is no fundamental reason why some planets are more or less eccentric than one another; it’s simply a result of the initial conditions from which the Solar System formed. However, the odds of a transit are much greater for an inner planet like Mercury, which makes 4 such transits every Earth year and has nearly a 2% chance of a good alignment, than any of the outer planets, which take longer to transit and have much lower odds of a good-enough alignment.

NASA / JPL-Caltech / R. Hurt

In our Solar System, Earth is a rocky planet with a thin atmosphere that orbits our Sun in what we call the habitable zone: at a distance where liquid water, given an Earth-like atmosphere, can stably exist on the planet’s surface. Mars and Venus may potentially lie in that region of space as well, but Venus is presently too hot and Mars is too cold (and with too thin of an atmosphere) for Earth-like life to thrive there.

At present, our two most prolific methods for finding planets outside of the Solar System are:

  1. the stellar wobble method, where an orbiting planet tugs on its parent star, causing it to oscillate along the viewer’s line-of-sight, and enabling scientists to determine the planet’s period and mass (up to the uncertainty of its orbital orientation), and
  2. the transit method, where an orbiting planet transits across the face of its parent star from the perspective of an external observer, periodically causing the parent star to dim as the planet’s disk blocks a portion of the star’s light.

The main transit (L) and the detection of the exoplanet dipping behind the parent star (R) of the… [+] Kepler exoplanet KOI-64. The main flux dip is how planetary transits are initially found; the additional information helps scientist determine properties beyond merely radius and orbital period.

Lisa J. Esteves, Ernst J. W. De Mooij and Ray Jayawardhana, via http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3271

If a sufficiently advanced alien civilization were examining Earth from a great distance, and we happened to be at the right orientation for our world to transit across the face of the Sun from their perspective, they’d have extraordinary reasons to be hopeful about finding out our world was inhabited.

It’s true: light can only travel at some finite speed (the speed of light), meaning that even the nearest stars are only now receiving signals from our planet that were emitted years or decades ago. More distant stars within our galaxy see Earth as it was centuries or millennia ago, while observers in distant galaxies see us as we were millions or even billions of years ago. Still, signatures that our planet is inhabited could be found from even a few billion light-years away, as aliens could take a spectrum of Earth’s atmosphere whenever a transit occurred.

This is an illustration of the different elements in NASA’s exoplanet program, including… [+] ground-based observatories, like the W. M. Keck Observatory, and space-based observatories, like Hubble, Spitzer, Kepler, Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite, James Webb Space Telescope, Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope and future missions. The power of TESS and James Webb combined will reveal the most Moon-like exomoons to date, possibly even in their star’s habitable zone, while ground-based 30 meter telescopes, WFIRST, and possibly a next-generation space-based observatory like LUVOIR or HabEx is required to truly find what humanity has been dreaming of for so long: an inhabited world outside of our Solar System.

NASA

As Earth passes in front of the Sun (or any planet passes in front of its parent star), the starlight that collides with:

  • the surface of Earth simply gets blocked, causing a flux dip announcing the planet’s presence,
  • nothing at all, missing the planet entirely, simply streams freely from the star to the observer, making up the background light,
  • the atmosphere of Earth (but not the surface) will largely pass through, but the atoms and molecules present will absorb a fraction of that light.

The absorbed light will excite the atoms or molecules they collide with, which can result in either an absorption or emission feature showing up in the atmospheric spectrum. We’ve already used this technique to discover atoms like hydrogen and helium — and even molecules like water — in the atmospheres of planets beyond our own Solar System.

When a planet transits in front of its parent star, some of the light is not only blocked, but if an… [+] atmosphere is present, filters through it, creating absorption or emission lines that a sophisticated-enough observatory could detect. If there are organic molecules or large amounts of molecular oxygen, we might be able to find that, too. at some point in the future. It’s important that we consider not only the signatures of life we know of, but of possible life that we don’t find here on Earth.

ESA / David Sing

If an alien civilization were capable of observing our planet at any point over the past 2-to-2.5 billion years, they’d discover a planet whose atmosphere was made mostly out of nitrogen gas, but with a very large-and-substantial fraction of molecular oxygen as well. Water vapor and argon gas would make up about 1% of the atmosphere each, and then there’d be trace amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, ozone, and a few other notable compounds.

This combination of gases would be a “smoking gun” for life if we found it on a world other than our own. We know of a few inorganic pathways to arrive at substantial amounts of oxygen on a planet, but reaching a level of 5% or more seems to be extremely disfavored without life. The presence of oxygen in a primarily nitrogen atmosphere is even more favorable for life, and so if Earth transited across the face of the Sun for an alien civilization, we’d be a tremendously interesting world, even during the era of the dinosaurs.

Although the exact ratios of the different atmospheric components of Earth throughout its entire… [+] history are unknown, there were large amounts of methane present in the atmosphere prior to 2.5 billion years ago and virtually no oxygen. With the arrival of oxygen, the methane was destroyed, and the planet’s greatest ice age began. However, these atmospheric changes were driven by biological processes; the detection of a biologically altered atmosphere could be our first hint of alien life beyond the Solar System.

Victor Ponce / San Diego State University

That’s a solid way to search for potentially inhabited worlds, but it only works for planets that are serendipitously aligned with their parent star from the viewpoint of an external, distant observer. It’s how future observatories, like the James Webb Space Telescope or the 30-meter ground-based telescopes currently under construction, plan to search the nearest transiting worlds to Earth for potential biosignatures.

However, we’re certain to miss most of the inhabited worlds if the transit technique is the only one we use. If the alignment is off by even a tiny amount — a fraction of a degree for a planet like Earth — the transit simply won’t occur, and we’ll have no way of probing its atmospheric contents. But all hope isn’t lost, because there’s another technique that doesn’t rely on a lucky alignment, and could be brought within our reach with foreseeable improvements in technology: direct imaging.

This visible-light image from the Hubble shows the newly discovered planet, Fomalhaut b, orbiting… [+] its parent star. This is the first time a planet was ever observed beyond the solar system using visible light. However, it will take a further advance in direct imaging to reveal an exomoon, or advanced signatures that can be attributed to intelligent aliens.

NASA, ESA, P. Kalas, J. Graham, E. Chiang, and E. Kite (University of California, Berkeley), M. Clampin (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.), M. Fitzgerald (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif.), and K. Stapelfeldt and J. Krist (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.)

Owing to the power of the Hubble Space Telescope (and later, ground-based adaptive optics), we’ve already taken our first direct images of exoplanets, and have even witnessed them actively orbiting their parent stars. By utilizing instruments such as a coronagraph or a starshade, we can block the light of the parent star the potentially inhabited planet orbits, imaging only the planet of interest instead.

From just a single pixel, if we’re willing to wait and observe the distant world over large amounts of time, we could not only tell whether it’s inhabited or not, but additionally we could look for some of the most striking features we find on Earth. By taking a direct image of a planet and quantifying the various wavelengths of light that arrive at different times, there’s a very long list of properties we could learn.

The Starshade concept could enable direct exoplanet imaging as early as the 2020s. This concept… [+] drawing illustrates a telescope using a star shade, enabling us to image the planets that orbit a star while blocking the star’s light to better than one part in 10 billion.

NASA and Northrop Grumman

From short-period changes and recurrent spectroscopic signatures, we could determine what the orbital period of the planet is.

From the colors of the planet, we could determine how much of the world is covered in water versus land versus ice, and detect the presence of clouds if they exist.

Over the course of a year (where the planet makes a full revolution around its parent star), we could determine:

  • its orbital properties (from the phases),
  • whether the land masses turn green and brown and green again with the passing of seasons (from photometric observations),
  • and, with advanced enough technology, we could even determine if there’s artificial lighting of any type unexpectedly illuminating the planet’s night side.

This composite image of the Earth at night shows the effects of artificial lighting on how our… [+] planet appears along the portion that isn’t illuminated by sunlight. This image was constructed based on 1994 and 1995 data, and the intervening 25 years have seen approximately a twofold increase in the amount of light humans create at night on Earth. We have conquered the night, but only at a great environmental cost. With an advanced enough telescope, an alien civilization could detect these artificial lights, and infer that Earth is inhabited by intelligent ‘aliens.’

Craig Mayhew and Robert Simmon, NASA GSFC; data from Marc Imhoff/NASA GSFC & Christopher Elvidge/NOAA NGDC

For an observer located less than 100 light-years away, that artificial lighting would be visible to a telescope large enough and optimized to view this type of faint light. It’s an amazing feat of technology that human beings have conquered the darkness of night through artificial lighting, but there’s a cost: the loss of the natural darkness that plants, animals, and other living creatures have adapted to over billions of years of evolution.

However, there’s a benefit we don’t often consider: the fact that we’ve modified the natural appearance of our planet means that a sufficiently intelligent alien species observing us could infer the existence of a planet-altering species. It’s not a slam dunk, but such a signature is a strong hint that the planet isn’t only inhabited, but inhabited by an intelligent, technologically advanced species.

Left, an image of Earth from the DSCOVR-EPIC camera. Right, the same image degraded to a resolution… [+] of 3 x 3 pixels, similar to what researchers will see in future exoplanet observations.

NOAA/NASA/Stephen Kane

Without a second example of life in the Universe, we can only speculate on what the odds of life arising on a potentially habitable planet are. There could be billions of other worlds in the galaxy with life on them right now, or Earth could be the only one. There could be complex life that sustains itself for hundreds of millions or even billions of years on a plethora of planets in the Milky Way, or Earth could be it.

And finally, there could be thousands of spacefaring alien species in our galaxy, or human beings might be the most advanced creatures in the entire visible Universe. Until we find a second example of life to know that we aren’t alone, all we can do is speculate and impose limits on what isn’t out there.

There are four known exoplanets orbiting the star HR 8799, all of which are more massive than the… [+] planet Jupiter. These planets were all detected by direct imaging taken over a period of seven years, with the periods of these worlds ranging from decades to centuries. As in our Solar System, the inner planets revolve around their star more rapidly, and the outer planets revolve more slowly, as predicted by the law of gravity. With the next generation of telescopes like JWST, GMT, and the ELT, we may be able to measure Earth-like or super-Earth-like planets around the nearest stars to us.

Jason Wang / Christian Marois

The same signals that we’re seeking from other civilizations — atmospheric signatures, surface features that evolve in a particular way, satellites and spacecraft, even deliberate and information-rich signals like FM radio waves — make our own civilization detectable by equally (or more) advanced extraterrestrials. From even a great distance away, an inhabited Earth would be identifiable, but an Earth inhabited by technologically advanced beings is only detectable to those civilizations close enough to see us in our recently achieved state.

Even though the majority of galaxies in the Universe are many billions of light-years away, there are millions upon millions of stars located within just a few hundred light-years of Earth. That means millions of planets, millions of chances at life, and even millions of possibilities for intelligent aliens. If even one such nearby world turns out to be inhabited, even the great cosmic distances won’t keep us from finding out about them, just as they’ll be more than capable of finding out about us, too.

The speed of light may be a limiting factor, but with enough time, the impact of human beings will be visible to any being residing in any one of more than 60 billion galaxies. It might not make for the fastest conversation, but finding even one instance of alien life beyond Earth would change our conception of existence forever. I can’t wait for us to find out!


Send in your Ask Ethan questions to startswithabang at gmail dot com!

Read More