In a ruling handed down on Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with state government officials that two Arizona election laws could be enforced, after a years-long legal battle.
🚨 The Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, allowed Arizona to enforce two previously blocked election laws governing voter registration and voting materials. It also overruled several Ninth Circuit precedents on organizational standing and resource diversion. pic.twitter.com/s98D55xPQY
— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) August 7, 2026
SCOTUS Wire provides a handy breakdown of the case and its particulars in a thread on X, writing that “[t]he lawsuit challenged a 2022 Arizona law that (1) requires counties to cancel a voter’s registration after they register in another Arizona county and (2) makes it a felony to provide a ‘mechanism for voting’ to someone registered in another state.”
“The court said organizations lack standing to challenge the voter registration cancellation law because FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine requires more than spending resources responding to a law,” it continues. “Plaintiffs must show the law directly interferes with their core activities.”
“It also overruled several Ninth Circuit precedents that had allowed organizational standing based on frustration of mission and diversion of resources. After Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, diversion of resources alone is no longer enough to establish Article III standing,” SCOTUS Wire adds.
Then it wraps up its analysis by stating:
Although the court found the organizations had standing to challenge Arizona’s felony provision, it held they were unlikely to succeed. While “mechanism for voting” could arguably sweep broadly, the statute’s text and context show it likely covers only actual voting materials.
My colleague Shipwreckedcrew, who is an attorney, says the ruling was “long overdue”:Â
Long overdue and it took far too long after the case was argued — June 2025 — for this result which was clear because the Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that the standard for organizational standing used by the 9th Circuit was too broad. https://t.co/cLLfX33icv
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) August 7, 2026
You can read the full ruling here.
Editor’s Note:Â Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
