One case of psychosis does not represent the experience of most people with psychotic disorders. This is a key point in understanding mental health conditions. Source: psychologytoday.com.
What Is Psychosis?
Psychosis involves disruptions in thinking, perception, and behavior. It can include hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thoughts.
These symptoms are not universal. They vary widely in intensity, duration, and impact from person to person.
Psychosis Is Not the Same for Everyone
Some people experience brief episodes of psychosis. Others have chronic symptoms that last for years.
- Some individuals black out during a psychotic episode and have no memory of it.
- Others remember every detail of their experience.
- Some have insight into their symptoms; others do not.
Hallucinations can be harmless or distressing. A voice might be comforting or threatening, depending on context and personal history.
Violence and Psychosis: A Misconception
It is common to assume that anyone with psychosis is violent. This belief is not supported by evidence.
Research indicates that between 80 and 90 percent of individuals with psychotic disorders do not engage in any violent behavior. This statistic is consistently reported in clinical literature and public health data.
One individual, Sarah Merritt Ryan, shares her personal experience: she was diagnosed with schizophrenia 15 years ago and has remained symptom-free for at least 13 years. In her own words, she recalls each of her four psychotic episodes in detail and confirms that no violent thoughts, impulses, words, or behaviors ever emerged during or after those episodes. She went on to give birth to a son during full recovery and emphasizes that, in remission, she is no different from any other mother.
Why One Case Cannot Define an Illness
Psychosis is not a single, uniform condition. It manifests in a wide range of forms, shaped by biological factors, environmental influences, trauma, and personal history.
Each case of psychosis is uniquely influenced by an individual’s insecurities, relationships, and past experiences. The brain may generate alternate realities or false narratives by reshuffling memories and emotions, and these experiences can feel as real as any lived experience—despite being rooted in neurological processes rather than external reality.
Media coverage often highlights dramatic or extreme cases of psychosis. These are not representative of the majority of experiences. As one expert notes, ‘We must be careful not to let one case define psychosis in general, as each case of psychosis can be as unique and varied as fingerprints.’ This selective exposure reinforces the idea that psychosis equates to danger, when in fact it is a deeply personal and individualized experience.
What Happens When Support Is Cut?
Reducing support for people with psychosis based on a single, rare incident risks undermining recovery and worsening long-term outcomes.
There is growing evidence that more people now fully recover from psychotic disorders than ever before—particularly in conditions like schizophrenia—thanks to improved access to medication, evidence-based therapies, and community-based resources. According to the World Health Organization, a third of individuals with schizophrenia achieve full recovery, meaning they no longer experience any symptoms and live stable, productive lives.
These advances in treatment have enabled many people to maintain daily functioning, build meaningful relationships, and contribute to society. When support is cut due to a single incident, it may prevent individuals from accessing the care they need, increasing the risk of relapse and social isolation.
Medical Causes Beyond Schizophrenia
Psychosis is not exclusively a psychiatric condition. It can arise from a range of medical conditions, including but not limited to: thyroid diseases, urinary tract infections, brain tumors, systemic infections like HIV, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, vitamin deficiencies, and lupus.
These examples demonstrate that psychosis can be a symptom of physical illness rather than a standalone mental health diagnosis. This underscores the importance of considering medical causes before making assumptions about a person’s behavior or risk level.
What This Means for Public Policy and Support
Decisions about care, stigma, and support should not be based on one extreme case. Instead, they must be grounded in evidence, individualized assessments, and an understanding of the diversity of lived experiences.
Stigma remains a significant barrier to treatment. When people with psychosis are judged based on media narratives or isolated incidents, they are less likely to seek help or remain engaged in recovery. Cutting support for individuals with psychosis due to rare cases of violence undermines both recovery and public safety.
Public policies that prioritize safety must also recognize that most people with psychosis are not violent. Evidence-based approaches that support early intervention, access to care, and community integration are more effective than fear-driven responses.
For more on how media shapes public perception, see Social Media Violence in Australia: The Case of Helen Haines.
Understanding psychosis requires nuance. It is not a single story. It is a diverse range of experiences shaped by individual lives and medical realities.
Sources & further reading
Featured image: original publisher image. Via original publisher. Image source
